Can one use the word ‘spakka’ in polite conversation these days? Well, maybe not polite, but in general conversation without being branded as some sort of disability hating punk motherfucker? It’s something that I remember Jimmy Carr saying, I think while being interviewed by Jonathan Ross. If memory serves, he was implying that it was possible to use it in the context of it being a piece of old playground slang, so could be said to be ironic. This is also backed up to a certain extent by the Spastic Society changing its name, ostensibly because the word had been tarnished by a thousand amused schoolboys. But does any of this make it okay?
I can’t really use that argument, due to my hopelessly PC upbringing. Most derogatory terms for minorities were drummed out of me at an early age and were only used by the naughtier common kids. How I became so middle class is a story for another day (the memories of the shock treatment are still too fresh in my mind). But this makes the concept of using any of these slurs something of a foreign land to me, which above anything else I’m quite happy about. ‘Live and let live’ has always been a credo I’ve felt comfortable with (the liberal conversion techniques have left even deeper emotional scars). But does any of this make it okay?
It’s not that I even want to use the word, as I certainly don’t feel the need to use any of the others that flew around my school. It’s just that I like to keep at the vanguard of swearing. I don’t feel particularly self-conscious using the word windowlicker, even after I found out what that meant. Perhaps if I had known when I was younger and had been rightly chastised for its use, my subconscious brain would have something to say about this. But as it first came to my attention via the Aphex Twin, I only feel amusement at someone’s childhood observation. That is perhaps how the two differ, one simply being the corruption of some unfortunates condition, the other the description of the unfortunates action. But does any of this make it okay?
Frankly I haven’t a clue. Societal consensus is the only way these things get accepted or rejected and I only ever seem to be prancing around on the peripheries of that. I’m not going to be the one to try and cross that line before someone else does it first and doesn’t get shot down in a hail of scornful buckshot. Cowardice perhaps, but probably the sensible option. So if you want to call anyone by any of the names mentioned above in front of me, feel free. I’ll just be observing the reactions of everyone else around to see if I can get away with it next time. Until then I’ll just keep calling everyone cunts.
Diatribes aside, today I highly recommend that you all go out and listen to Stephen Malkmus’ self titled debut album. It’s a quite wonderful collection of material, easily as good as the stuff he was recording with Pavement. Who could argue with songs written from the point of view of Yul Brynner, or about small boys going out and becoming pirates? Three quarters of an hour of fun for all the family. Join me tomorrow for the last entry before a weeks radio silence . . .